Skip to main content.
July 5th, 2005

The movie-maker

A rather un-inspiring weekend. Went out Friday and Saturday, but really not in the mood to get wild (not that I ever really do), nor to do “phone-number begging” (not that I ever really do).
I did however sleep quite a bit on Sunday. Also the weather was bad, so I stayed at home all day. It’s actually been raining for a few days already.
Today I went to the gym. Ran about 3 kilometers. I weighed at 70.40 Kg. That means that I’m keeping my weight, actually lowering it: 0.05 Kg less. Even though recently I keep going to the gym just once per week.

I’ve been on and off, trying to do some video editing. I have footage of a recent gathering at the home of a friend. I’m trying to get something out of it.
The biggest problem is the quality of the shots. It’s all jerky and the contents are far from scripted. Whomever takes the shot (me included), it hardly ever comes out something really useful. Especially if one would like to put things in a logical sequence.
Recently I’ve been trying to put music in background. That works well when there isn’t much yelling and screaming, basically on outdoor shots. That’s not the case for what I have here, so I need to make the best of what people say, edit it in a way that it’s not boring, but that isn’t unfair either.
This time I’m experimenting with chopping dialogues as to give the impression of a faster pace. Not sure what the technical term would be. I’ve seen it used on some recent serial TVs 8)
I’ve also been close to twist a sequence and make it seem like a friend is talking bad of the girlfriend of another friend.. A few cuts and what is a positive remark, can turn into a negative comment. I’m trying to avoid that, but at the same time it makes me think on how many times I see something in TV and I’m perhaps being fed the wrong message, thanks to malicious editing or by mistake.

In any case this editing is taking quite a chunk of time. Encoding will take a few more hours too. De-interlace is a must if one isn’t encoding a DVD. That takes time. Noise-reduction is also pretty important for indoor shots (especially with my aging camera), that takes quite a bit of time too. Color correction is also important, that probably doesn’t take much time.. ..ops, I’m supposed to work in the color space thing !

I better go to sleep. Poof !

Posted by Davide Pasca in Uncategorized

This entry was posted on Tuesday, July 5th, 2005 at 2:08 am and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the comments RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

5 Responses to “The movie-maker”

  1. Rasty says:

    Here there have been a lot of scandals about how TV changes content by just a few smart cuts here and there..

    Anyway, I’m getting thrilled by the recent all-digital cameras that save on memory cards. The biggest issue with these is of course the amount of space, pretty limited (and expensive) for now even with the stock 2gb Samsung one.. but give it 1 or 2 years and memory will hopefully be cheap enough to afford some decent recording times!
    woo!

  2. Rasty says:

    Humm I’ve just done a little research and it looks like the SAMSUNG VP-M110 I was talking about has a host USB2.0 connection for moemory sticks or hard drives.. This way, one could very well bring along a 2″ HD with a USB case (I’ve got a 60gb one, they’re unexpensive now) and transfer the movies from the Camera to the HD without the need to bring along a laptop PC!
    woowoo!

  3. Davide Pasca says:

    Hold your horses !

    Having to deal with tapes is a pain, but the quality makes it worth it.
    I have a relatively old Sony DCR-PC101 with MiniDV tapes. I think that for one hour of filming it takes about 18GB of space.

    Those 2GB solutions probably encode directly in MPEG2/4 format. The MiniDV encodes with some sort of MJPEG, no motion artifacts.

    I suspect that having something encoded with MPEG2 can compromise the eventual post-processing.
    Also keep in mind that motion compression is a very processor intensive work. The more time and power you have, the better the result.
    I don’t think that something so small that runs on battery really has enough power to do a great job at compressing MPEG2/4 at 30fps…

    Of course, one just wants a compact camera to bring anywhere, to film this and that.
    It’s my experience however that, unless you want to bore spectators, you should bore yourself doing editing and all the postoprocessing necessary to improve quality.

    Those small cameras are probably quite worse at shooting indoor. That means that you’ll have to reprocess the whole thing boasting brightness, contrast and saturation (I already have to do it with my camcorder).

    I’ve been thinking quite a bit on what I wanted next from a camcorder, and I decided that I’ll go for another expensive MiniDV. One that is especially good at indoors. Basically with very good sensors, that naturally give good color and reduce noise.

  4. rince says:

    yo razdee, long time no see, you married yet?

    by the way what do you think of the Gizmondo handheld? Are we going to get a review from you?

  5. Rasty says:

    Hola Mr. Rincecream!
    No way I’m married yet but if yours is a proposal I may consider it :)
    I doubt the Gizmondo will be reviewable by me since it doesn’t happen to be available around here.. maybe I’d get a trip to the US!

    Kaz I think you’re right about the compression stuff.. it has to be seen how good/bad is the MPEG4 quality these cameras produce, mostly after some postprocessing, and if one’s willing to compromise some quality for the increased manageability…!

    The thing is I never really liked tape cameras and am really looking forward to a good alternative.. maybe the time has not come yet for the all-digital cameras but this sure is a step in the right direction! woo!

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>