Skip to main content.
June 22nd, 2005

Somewhat emotive but not instinctive (all spell-checked !)

It’s almost 2AM. Yesterday night I couldn’t sleep until around 5 ! It was dreadful, I had to call in sick, although only for the first half of the day. I went in at 1PM instead of 10AM.
Once I got in the office however, I was for most part, adrenalinic. I wrote quit a bit of code without dangling too much. Clearly productive, mostly due to the fact that I didn’t have to wake up at 9, shower, run, eat one large meal, etc.

M4D has finally gotten a decent shape. I added hooks to the model, material and texture classes. The hooks are a user-data pointer and a user-data-delete callback. Those hooks allow me to attach rendering related structures. A texture class will normally have just the name of the texture file, the attached user-data will provide a pointer to a structure/class used by the rendering subsystem.. which will contain whatever data is necessary to feed to OpenGL or Direct3D for actual rendering. Same goes for the model class, which, when is a mesh (a model that contains geometry) will have an hook to vertex and triangle data that can be fed directly to OpenGL (or, again, eventually, Direct3D).
I’m so far pretty happy with this, because it allows me to have a pretty solid and generic underlying engine which can be a starting point for actual hardware and API-dependent engines. Generality always comes to a price, but thinking optimized for a specific hardware and API from the start is comes to a bigger price. Generality was also the key-point for me, as the main goal was really to have a framework for 3D geometry storage and processing.

I should be in bed after this, but I need to add more 8)
A couple of days ago, on the movie channel on cable, I saw again Equilibrium (ohh, I see why they showed it again, it’s with the protagonist of Batman Begins 8). The movie is about a society where emotions are repressed with a "medicine" and fascist-style policing, as to avoid wars, which are touted as side-effect of people being influnced by emotions.
The topic is too big to be analyzed at 2:21AM.. but I think that the question is very big even at a personal level. In life I look back an see how the things that I could achieve were achieved thanks to focus and commitment, avoiding emotions, which normally would make one derail.
The movie shows that emotions are the essence of human life and shouldn’t be avoided. However, it’s also true that the human being’s main strength is the ability to override instincts for a greater goal. The movie (probably by design) doesn’t go deep enough to reveal that while emotions are generally good, they are also a lot more valuable than instincts. Instincts can bring some emotions, but not as refined as those that are brought by actions which are done while containing instincts ! (did I write that right ? ummm)
Basically, instinctively, people could fack around and crack each other’s skulls over some edible or some fuckable. Emotionally, it makes more sense to think twice before acting and use more logic.

The problem really, is that many let themselves go for instincts and forget about the more refined emotions. It’s something that everyone should think about. It’s something that can make a great difference in life.. the difference between being a sheep and a human.

And now it’s my time to go count the sheep !

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Posted by Davide Pasca in Uncategorized

This entry was posted on Wednesday, June 22nd, 2005 at 2:35 am and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the comments RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

12 Responses to “Somewhat emotive but not instinctive (all spell-checked !)”

  1. ragin' lion says:

    Yo! What’s up with this calling in sick business? I hope you’re taking care of your body! You should probably (at least twice a week) force yourself to go to sleep by 12am. Forget the sleeping pills business. Grab a book or something that will make you so bored, you’ll fall asleep. Regularly taking what basically amounts to chemicals to induce sleep’s not a good idea. Perhaps that’s what you’re having trouble sleeping in the first place? Then again, I’m not a doctor! 8P

    I think that there needs to be a balance between one’s emotions and one’s instincts. Otherwise, one runs the risk of being extreme in either case. But this is more of a complex subject and topic. I think there’s something fundamentally “broken” about human nature and thus it gives rise to how people tend to be have in particular situations. It’s like trying to steer a ship with a half-functioning rudder. Sometimes you’ll go where you want, sometimes time you won’t.

    Anyway, enough typing … I need to go eat!

  2. Anonymous says:

    what happened to my comment?

  3. Davide Pasca says:

    Humans compared to animals, seem to be broken, if anything because of how they deal with environment. However, animals themselves aren’t quite as straight as we imagine them. They too can dream, kill each other (within the same species) or play with sex, from not being monogamous to not being straight or even being able to be both male and female.
    So, in general, I think that we are mostly particularly intelligent, but not necessarely more twisted to start with.
    Also, one has to think that as much as humans can mess the planet up.. it still would be a heaven if compared to a billion years ago 8)

  4. rince says:

    Humans invented c++ …….

  5. ragin' lion says:

    Well, this could all surely plunge into a deep philosophical debate! Let’s go!!

    They too can dream, kill each other (within the same species) or play with sex, from not being monogamous to not being straight or even being able to be both male and female.

    You’re quite right, but human beings have that special quality to go beyond what the animals can (in the above mentioned points) in terms of the level of harm or evil that can be done (to others/other things or to themselves).

    Animals are animals; nothing more nothing less. One can’t necessarily apply standards that animals live by to humans and vice versa.

    Man is able to focus his energies enough to put men on the moon and probes on Mars, but at the same time turn those same energies against himself (war, racial hatred, etc).

    I never said that human beings are more twisted because of our intelligence. What I mean is that because of that fundamentally “broken” thing, human beings are more likely to wield such “power” (intelligence) carelessly and possibly dangerously. If the core or foundation of something is flawed, the system that is based on that foundation will be flawed … despite efforts to fix things above the foundation.

    Also, one has to think that as much as humans can mess the planet up.. it still would be a heaven if compared to a billion years ago

    He he he … Well, at the present rate things are going globally, it’s hard to imagine that the planet will be around a billion years from now.

    I’m not being pessimistic, but unless something about our attitudes towards one another and how we manage the resources on the planet changes I highly doubt there’s going to be any life left.

    rince: Be careful … for those words could very well start WWIII!!! 8P

  6. Anonymous says:

    Well if any of the millitary systems code is written in c++ then we have nothing to fear from wwiii =)

    The only ‘destruction’ will be when a destructor for some object gets called incorrectly and crashes the memory manager.

  7. rince says:

    eeehhh, i am sure i clicked on “Other” and put ‘rince’ under Name this time.

  8. Davide Pasca says:

    Rince: I think that C++ creators actually had a message to bring. Whether they did it consciously or not, the message is that the World is full of bullshit, you are in the middle of it, deal with it and see what you can come out with. Maybe it’s a natural evolution of things, maybe some very sub-plotting genius planted all this for us (I’m more for the first theory 8).

    Ragin: my take on the topic is summarized by a closing comment of George Carlin. I don’t remember exactly the words he said, but, paraphrasing, he said that we must be very arrogant to think that we can do much to the planet. We regard to plastic as an ill, but what do we know ? Maybe the planet wanted plastic for itself and it created humans because it couldn’t make it itself !
    When we say that we are destroying the planet, we mean that we worsen it relatively to our physical constitution. However, all living creatures that we know are evolving by design. Adaptation is the main skill. If we claim that the planet should stay as it is, then we claim that we are perfect as we are. On the evolutionary point of view, nobody is never really perfect, as the best fit is constantly changing by an incalculable amount of factors. We play catch-up in a game in witch we are actors to some degree, but mostly spectators. If we think that one day one large celestial body is going to collide with Earth or in a billion years the Sun is going to cool down and everything freezes.. ..then we can see how little power we really do have. To keep the planet clean for a few generations.. I can understand, but in the long term, we are still just peeons ..we theorize about celestial bodies, but our practical sphere of influence is really insignificant.

  9. Davide Pasca says:

    I could swear that I spelled “which” wrong.. yet the spell checker kept telling me I was right 8P

    Spell checkers are witches !!!

  10. ragin' lion says:

    You C++ haterz! I’ll have your operators overloaded for such words!!

    I haven’t read Imperfect C++ yet, but from the overview it seems like it is a good book.

    Kaz:
    I suppose one could look at things from the viewpoint you mentioned. If that is truly case, then perhaps then there’s no need to be concerned about balancing between one’s instincts and emotions; whichever works best for the individual.

    By that logic someone unleashing great good vs. someone unleashing great evil or destruction really are just two sides of the same “evolutionary” coin.

    I definately agree with you in that compared to what’s going on in the universe as a whole, human beings are pretty insignificant. But I think that what each individual does matters and makes a difference in both the short and long term … perhaps not on Jupiter or the other planets, but definately here on the earth.

    Whether the sun’s going to chill out evenutally or some giant rock falls out of the sky and extinguishes life on the earth actually isn’t of great importance in comparison to how people choose to treat one another hear and now.

    I’m at least greatful some folks were focused enough to create series of different inventions and technologies which allow me to do the kind of work I do today.

    Speaking of technologies, what’s up with the incorrect usage of the blog features? 8P Always trouble with setting the proper identity and now spellcheck!

    Which brower are you using? I’m using FireFox

  11. Davide Pasca says:

    Using Firefox here too. The spellcheck was done with Crimson Editor (I edited the comment in there). The spellchecker wasn’t wrong. This is actually a problem with spell checking: one may feel like there is no need to check twice, as the spelling of every individual word is correct !

    I see your point about being good to the planet for the sake of being good. Still one has to use own judgement. It’s hard to be straight good.. many medical advances are based on using animals for experiments, some of them pretty cruel. We all look into the future where injured people can get prosthetic limbs and bionic eyes, but at price for the animals which had those things tested on them before.
    Also we take quite some advantage on stopping the natural course of things when we kill bacteria with medicines, wear clothes and generally “process” animals to provide for food.
    What’s not evil ? 8)

  12. Anonymous says:

    I agree with you Davide, but we have the tend to keep things as they are, and that doesn’t mean we consider we are perfect the way we are, it only means we feel secure with things we know, and we don’t like changes. For me it’s useless to think if it would be good or bad for humans to keep the planet clean or not, the course of events won’t stop. The only difference would be an evolution of our intelligence. We can’t manage changes with the small portion of brains we use, because now changes are more fast than mind. We don’t see/understand problems, so it’s no possible to find solutions.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>